Man falls to death avoiding Football

サッカーボール避けバイクの男性（87）骨折→認知症→翌年、食物誤嚥で死亡　蹴った少年の親に1500万円賠償命令
An 87 year old man fell from his bicycle avoiding a flying football and received many broken bones → developed dementia → and the next year died of pulmonary aspiration ... Family seeks 15000000 JPY in reparation from the the parents of the boy who kicked the ball.

1 ：有明省吾 ◆BAKA1DJoEI ＠有明省吾ρ ★：2011/06/28(火) 12:19:17.54 ID:???0


In an Oosaka court a case has been opened to determine if a 19 year old boy is responsible for negligent behaviour when he was a 5th year primary school student and kicked a football out of the pitch which caused a man passing by on his bicycle to fall and at the age of 87 lose his life.
 
According to the boy's defense, in February 2004 he was doing free kick practice at the school pitch when a kick aimed at the goal flew over the school gate and rolled onto the street. A man on a bicycle attempting to avoid the ball fell and broke his leg. After that incident he developed symptoms of dementia and in July of the next year accidentally intook some foodstuffs into his trachea and died of pulmonary asphyxiation.

The boy's defense claims "He kicked the ball towards the goal like normal, there's nothing in illegal in that," but on the 27th the decision came that, "Depending on the manner in which the ball was kicked, it would be possible to foretell its traveling into the street. Because the boy was a minor at the time he has no legal responsibility, however his parents are responsible to pay restitution."
http://www.asahi.com/national/update/0628/OSK201106280038.html

3 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:20:41.75 ID:gzs1o7Ih0
きびしいな Wow that's strict

4 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:21:03.11 ID:ZM9YAF3E0
これはメチャクチャ This is all messed up

7 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:21:51.29 ID:L+QCGSgB0
直接の死因ならまだしもなあ Even if it had been the direct cause of death I'm still on the fence about this one

44 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:25:47.97 ID:OVO5IMoG0
子供というより、ゴールの後ろに防球ネットがないのが問題じゃないか
Ignoring the child, isn't the problem here that there was a net to catch stray balls behind the goal?

20 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:23:35.46 ID:lxkl6cue0
これは本人＆親じゃなくて、ボールが道路に出る可能性がある位置にゴールを設置した
学校に行くべきじゃない？
Rather than the boy and his parents, isn't this the schools fault for positioning the goal in a way such that balls might fly into the street?

385 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:46:15.68 ID:ZM9YAF3E0
>>20
仮に責任を負う必要があるなら当然施設管理者でしょうなあ
そこでサッカーやってた児童の親に賠償責任が行くなんて全くあり得ないことだよ
Even if someone was held responsible for that it would be the contstruction planners
It's completely unbelievable that they would seek restitution from the child's parents

24 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:23:51.68 ID:413Wy/520
足の骨折と認知症って何の関係があるの？
How is breaking your leg linked with dementia anyway?

66 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:27:51.23 ID:4rUmvSZq0
>>24
マメに動けなくなるとボケやすくなる
体も加速度的に弱っていくしいろんな意味で年寄りの骨折はやばい
Immobility can addle the mind easily
The body also weakens rapidly, so for a lot reasons a broken bone in the eldery is very dangerous

31 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:24:29.16 ID:Ypiy5i/h0
飛び出ても仕方がないって感じで球蹴ったりボール投げたりしてたらダメだと思うよ。
この場合子供がってより、学校側に問題があると思うけど。 
I think it's definitely bad to just kick and throw balls around with no regard to where they might go.
But in this case rather than the actions of the child, I think the blame rests with the school.

32 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:24:30.80 ID:CTspaF000
ボールが飛び出ないようにしておかなかったとか言って
学校と市は訴えなかったの 
Why didn't the sue the school and the city for not making it such that the ball couldn't fly out in the first place

34 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:25:08.81 ID:3opJpjOeI
子供が飛び出してもおなじか？この事例は
What if a child had ran out into the street? Would that be the same thing

302 ：名無しさん＠１２周年：2011/06/28(火) 12:40:58.24 ID:lwZHwX5p0
飛び出してきたのがボールじゃなくて子供だったらジジイの責任になるのにな
If it had been a child instead of a ball than the fault would lie with the old man

Let's learn Japanese! 
骨折 kossetu
A broken bone